“The Wire” star Isiah Whitlock Jr. has died. He was 71 years old.

Whitlock died peacefully in New York on Tuesday after battling a short illness, his manager, Brian Liebman, confirmed to the Associated Press.

Whitlock was best known for his role as corrupt senator Clay Davis on HBO’s “The Wire.”

“The Wire” star Isiah Whitlock Jr. has died. He was 71 years old. (Getty Images)

Liebman took to Instagram on Tuesday to honor Whitlock following his passing.

“It is with great sadness that I share the passing of my dear friend and client Isiah Whitlock Jr. If you knew him, you loved him. A brilliant actor and an even better person. May his memory forever be a blessing. Our hearts are so broken. He will be greatly missed,” Liebman wrote alongside images of the actor.

DO YOU LIKE WHAT YOU READ? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

Whitlock also plays a significant role in “Veep,” playing George Maddox, the U.S. Secretary of Defense.

Isiah Whitlock Jr. is best known for his role on HBO’s “The Wire.” (Getty Images)

The actor also appeared in some Spike Lee films, including “BlacKkKlansman”, “Da 5 Bloods”, “She Hate Me”, “25th Hour”, “Red Hook Summer” and “Chi-Raq”.

In “25th Hour,” Whitlock introduced his signature phrase, “sheeeeeit,” which was his interpretation of “sh-t.” His phrase became so popular that the writers of “The Wire” decided to incorporate it into his character’s lingo.

CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

“I was, I think, at Grand Central Station and in the distance I heard someone say it and he was smiling,” he said. “I’m glad people like it,” Whitlock said in a 2008 interview.

Whitlock also appeared in a number of Spike Lee films. (Getty Images)

Whitlock also had a role in Martin Scorsese’s “Goodfellas.”

Whitlock’s last TV role was on Netflix’s “The Residence.” The series premiered on the streaming service in March. He also served as a voice actor in the Pixar animated film, “Hoppers”, which is scheduled for release in 2026.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The Trump administration is entering into bilateral agreements with countries affected by widespread reductions in U.S. foreign aid.

The administration of US President Donald Trump has signed an agreement providing $480 million in public health aid to Ivory Coast.

The agreement, signed Tuesday in Abidjan, the capital of the West African country, is the latest turning point in the Trump administration’s “America First” global health strategy.

The plan envisions entering into bilateral agreements with dozens of countries to receive U.S. health aid following the administration’s elimination of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

The Trump administration has maintained that U.S. foreign aid policy is ineffective and unnecessary, saying bilateral agreements would create more accountability, oversight and, ultimately, self-sufficiency.

Experts have questioned the effectiveness of this approach and sounded the alarm about its transactional nature.

At the signing ceremony Tuesday, U.S. Ambassador to Ivory Coast Jessica Davis Ba said the U.S. government was moving “beyond the traditional approach to aid to a model focused on trade, innovation and shared prosperity.”

“Today, our bilateral cooperation enters a new phase. We are implementing the America First global health strategy,” the ambassador said.

As part of the agreement, Ivory Coast has committed to ultimately providing up to $292 million in health financing by 2030, Ivorian Prime Minister Robert Beugre Mambe said.

The deal is the largest of more than a dozen other agreements reached so far by the Trump administration under the new strategy.

Cuts to USAID

Significant USAID budget cuts earlier this year disrupted public health services around the world, with Africa particularly hard hit.

This has raised concerns about the potential increase in the spread of HIV on the continent, declining maternal and child health care, increased cases of malaria and reduced early detection of new infectious diseases.

While the Ivory Coast deal and other new bilateral agreements seek to address these issues, public health experts are wary of the administration’s approach.

An analysis earlier this month by the Center for Global Development indicates that the new strategy presents several potentially beneficial changes to the delivery of health assistance abroad.

However, these changes “carry enormous risks to service delivery and hard-won public health gains,” wrote senior analyst Jocilyn Estes and policy researcher Janeen Madan Keller.

The pair identified several potential areas of risk, including public health priorities that could be shaped by “transactional pressures,” questions about surveillance, and a lack of clarity on how services will be protected if a partner country is unable to meet its commitments.

Experts further question what the strategy would mean for aid in areas where there is no “credible or stable government.”

“Implementing a reconfigured approach to U.S. global health assistance – particularly direct government assistance – at such scale and speed is unprecedented,” they wrote, adding that “every point of potential failure puts lives at risk.”