The India-Pakistan conflict in May was among the controversial topics mediated by Beijing in 2025, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said on Tuesday.
“This year, local wars and cross-border conflicts have broken out more often than at any time since the end of World War II. [World War II]”Wang said at a conference on China’s foreign relations in Beijing. “Geopolitical turbulence continued to spread.”
To build lasting peace, “we took an objective and fair position, and focused on resolving the symptoms and root causes,” added the Chinese foreign minister.
“Following this Chinese approach to resolving sensitive issues, we have played a mediating role in northern Myanmar, on the Iranian nuclear issue, on tensions between Pakistan and India, on issues between Palestine and Israel and on the recent conflict between Cambodia and Thailand,” he said.
Wang also said relations between New Delhi and Beijing had gained “good momentum”, citing China inviting the prime minister. Narendra Modi in Tianjin in August for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit.
India’s foreign ministry did not react to Wang’s claims. But he maintained that the ceasefire with Islamabad was not the result of a mediation. THE decision to stop The shooting took place after Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations called his Indian counterpartNew Delhi said.
It has been repeated several times rejected US President Donald Trump’s claims that Washington mediated the ceasefire.
The Congress on Wednesday slammed China’s claims and called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi to provide clarity on the issue.
“China’s claims of mediating between India and Pakistan are worrying, not only because they contradict what has been said to the people of the country so far, but also because they appear to make a mockery of our national security,” Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said in a social media post.
Ramesh linked the issue to India’s broader relations with China. “We have resumed negotiations with China – but unfortunately these negotiations are taking place on China’s terms,” he said.
“Our trade deficit is at a record level and a large part of our exports depend on imports from China,” he added. “China’s provocative actions against Arunachal Pradesh continue unabated. »
“Amid such one-sided and hostile relations, the people of India deserve to clarify the role that China played in the sudden halt to Operation Sindoor,” the Congress leader said.
President Trump has long claimed that he personally intervened to end Operation Vermilion on May 10, 2025. He has made this claim 65 times in at least seven different countries, on different platforms. The Prime Minister criticized the actions of his so-called good friend… pic.twitter.com/sXhSNiaR8S
-Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) December 31, 2025
Tensions between New Delhi and Islamabad intensified in May when the Indian military led strikes – code name Operation Sindoor – on what it claims are terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.
The strikes were a response to the terrorist attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir, which killed 26 people on April 22.
Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes on several occasions bombing of Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir.
In July, the Indian military said Pakistan had been receive information in real time of China on India’s large military deployments during the four-day conflict in May.
Lieutenant General Rahul R SinghDeputy Chief of Army (Capability Development and Sustainment), had said that India effectively faced three adversaries during the conflict, with Pakistan leading the front, China providing considerable support and Turkey plays an important role in providing drones “as well as trained people who were on site”.
The Indian Army said that over the past five years, 81% of military equipment that Pakistan received was Chinese. “[China] is able to test [its] weapons against various other weapon systems that are there, so it’s like an actual laboratory at their disposal,” Singh had said.
Also read: Modi in China: new detente or progressive trajectory?


